Dialister micraerophilus is a slow-growing, Gram-negative anaerobe that is part of the normal microbiota of the oral, gastrointestinal, and urogenital tracts. Although not routinely screened for, it has emerging clinical relevance as a potential opportunistic pathogen in polymicrobial and gynecologic infections.
Dialister micraerophilus is a Gram-negative, anaerobic, and microaerophilic coccobacillus first described in 2005. It belongs to the Dialister genus and is part of the normal microbiota of the oral cavity, gastrointestinal tract, and urogenital tract.
Although not commonly isolated, it has been identified in clinical samples from blood, abscesses, bone, and gynecologic tissues. As an anaerobic organism, it thrives in environments with little or no oxygen.
Detection of D. micraerophilus is not part of routine clinical screening but is relevant in two key settings:
It has been found in studies exploring microbial imbalance (dysbiosis), particularly in oral and urogenital environments.
Although its pathogenic role is still being defined, D. micraerophilus has been associated with various infections, including oral infections, Bartholin’s abscesses, and anaerobic bacteremia. It is especially relevant when isolated from polymicrobial samples or when anaerobic infection is suspected.
Dialister micraerophilus is a fastidious, anaerobic to microaerophilic gram-negative coccobacillus that requires specific protocols for accurate recovery and identification.
In clinical settings, D. micraerophilus has been isolated from a variety of human specimens, including:
D. microaerophilus grows as tiny, circular, transparent colonies on Columbia blood agar under anaerobic or microaerophilic conditions.
Its subtle morphology and slow growth make it difficult to detect in mixed cultures.
Biochemical testing is limited due to its asaccharolytic and unreactive profile in conventional assays.
Identification typically requires 16S rRNA gene sequencing. For species-level confirmation, a partial 600-bp sequence with ≥99% identity to the type strain is used.
Disk susceptibility profiles may support differentiation from Veillonella spp.:
Performed via agar dilution following CLSI M11-A6 guidelines.
Testing is recommended when D. micraerophilus is implicated in polymicrobial infections, especially if refractory to empirical treatment.
Microbiome testing is increasingly performed to assess microbial balance and gut health.
Microbiome testing that includes Dialister microaerophilus is typically done through stool sample analysis. This test can be conducted using various methods, such as PCR, next-generation sequencing (NGS), or culture-based techniques.
A stool sample is collected and analyzed to quantify the presence of Dialister microaerophilus and assess its relative abundance compared to other gut bacteria.
Always consult the ordering provider or laboratory company prior to sample collection, as special preparation, such as avoiding antibiotics or probiotics, may be necessary in the days leading up to sample collection.
Normal reference ranges for Dialister microaerophilus can vary based on the laboratory and the microbiome composition of the healthy population. Generally, the goal is to maintain a balanced ratio of Dialister microaerophilus alongside other beneficial gut flora.
Increased levels of D. micraerophilus may indicate dysbiosis or contribute to anaerobic infections.
Its role is often context-dependent—for example, it has been detected in pure culture from a Bartholin’s abscess and in polymicrobial uterine pus in a case of bacteremia.
Presence in sterile sites warrants clinical attention, particularly in women with pelvic or gynecologic infections. However, its detection alone doesn’t confirm pathogenicity without supporting clinical evidence.
The absence or reduction of D. micraerophilus generally has no diagnostic significance on its own.
The human microbiome is complex, and changes in one species do not necessarily reflect disease. Interpretation should always consider clinical context, other microbial findings, and sample type.
D. micraerophilus is slow-growing and may be underdiagnosed. It is best identified by 16S rRNA sequencing or MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry.
Though susceptibility data are limited, it is often sensitive to beta-lactams (e.g., amoxicillin-clavulanate, piperacillin-tazobactam), carbapenems, and clindamycin.
However, resistance to metronidazole has been reported, so susceptibility testing is advised when this organism is isolated from sterile or high-risk sites.
Dialister micraerophilus is an anaerobic, Gram-negative bacterium that may act as an opportunistic pathogen, especially in gynecologic and polymicrobial infections.
Due to slow growth and small colony size, identification often requires advanced molecular methods.
Consider this organism in persistent or recurrent anaerobic infections, especially when metronidazole treatment fails.
When isolated, antimicrobial susceptibility testing should guide therapy due to variable resistance patterns.
Click here to compare testing options and order testing for microbiome balance.
Achuff, J. (2024, February 26). The Power of Microbiome Diversity: A Shield Against Pathogen Invasion. Rupa Health. https://www.rupahealth.com/post/the-power-of-microbiome-diversity-a-shield-against-pathogen-invasion
Cloyd, J. (2023, December 20). Gut Microbiome Testing: How to Use This Powerful Tool in Practice. Rupa Health. https://www.rupahealth.com/post/gut-microbiome-testing-how-to-use-this-powerful-tool-in-practice
Cobo, F., Rodríguez-Granger, J., Sampedro, A., & Navarro-Marí, J. M. (2018). Bartholin’s abscess due to Dialister micraerophilus in a woman presenting with repetitive bartholinitis episodes. Médecine et Maladies Infectieuses, 48(3), 225–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medmal.2017.12.008
Dialister spp. | Office of Research Safety | The George Washington University. (2019). Office of Research Safety. https://researchsafety.gwu.edu/pathogen-data-sheets/dialister-spp
Jumas-Bilak, E., Jean-Pierre, H., Carlier, J.-P., Teyssier, C., Bernard, K., Gay, B., Campos, J., Morio, F., & Marchandin, H. (2005). Dialister micraerophilus sp. nov. and Dialister propionicifaciens sp. nov., isolated from human clinical samples. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 55(6), 2471–2478. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.63715-0
Kitagawa H, Tadera K, Omori K, Nomura T, Shigemoto N, Ohge H. A case of bacteremia caused by Dialister micraerophilus with Enterocloster clostridioformis and Eggerthella lenta in a patient with pyometra. BMC Infect Dis. 2024 Jan 24;24(1):128. doi: 10.1186/s12879-024-08999-6. PMID: 38267864; PMCID: PMC10809547.
Morio F, Jean-Pierre H, Dubreuil L, Jumas-Bilak E, Calvet L, Mercier G, Devine R, Marchandin H. Antimicrobial susceptibilities and clinical sources of Dialister species. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007 Dec;51(12):4498-501. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00538-07. Epub 2007 Oct 8. PMID: 17923492; PMCID: PMC2167981.