Masu salmon (Oncorhynchus masou), also known as cherry salmon, is a Pacific salmon species native to the cold rivers and coastal waters of East Asia. Prized in Japanese cuisine and aquaculture, this species is notable for its limited range, nutritional richness, and emerging relevance in food safety and allergy research.
Masu salmon, also known as cherry salmon, is a Pacific salmon species native to the cold waters of the western Pacific, especially around Japan, Korea, and Russia.
It has the most limited geographic range of any Pacific salmon and is especially valued in Japan for its cultural and culinary importance.
As a type of salmon, masu salmon is highly nutritious, offering a balanced profile of protein, healthy fats, and micronutrients. The typical nutrient profile of salmon includes:
Regular consumption of masu salmon may offer multiple health benefits:
Although nutritious, masu salmon, like other fish, may contain environmental contaminants:
Wild-caught masu generally has lower contaminant levels, while some farmed salmon—especially from Europe—may pose higher health risks.
The EPA and FDA recommend the following guidelines:
Eat 2–3 servings per week of fish from the “Best Choices” list or one serving from the “Good Choices” list.
Children should eat 1–2 servings per week from the “Best Choices” list, with smaller portion sizes by age.
If eating locally caught fish or shellfish, check for local advisories. If none exist, limit to 1 serving per week and avoid other fish that week.
Masu salmon, like other finned fish, can trigger allergic reactions in sensitized individuals. Fish allergy is a common cause of adult-onset food allergy and may result in symptoms ranging from mild (hives, GI upset) to severe (anaphylaxis).
Cross-reactivity among different fish species is common, so individuals allergic to one type of fish may need to avoid others unless cleared by an allergist.
Food allergies and food sensitivities are different immune responses to food. Whether a person has a food allergy or food sensitivity, the proteins in a particular food are often (but not always) responsible for triggering the immune system's reaction.
Food allergies, typically IgE-mediated, cause immediate, sometimes severe reactions like anaphylaxis within minutes to hours of eating the food, often triggered by common allergens like nuts, seafood, or dairy.
On the other hand, food sensitivities are more common and involve delayed non-IgE-mediated immune reactions such as gastrointestinal discomfort or skin issues, usually occurring hours or days after consuming the food. They may involve an IgG-mediated immune response, and other immune-mediated chemicals may also be present.
While food allergies can cause life-threatening reactions like anaphylaxis and are often identified early, food sensitivities are not life-threatening and can be managed with dietary changes.
Both are triggered when the immune system mistakenly identifies food proteins as harmful, but food allergies involve an immediate IgE response, while food sensitivities are due to a delayed immune reaction.
Food sensitivity testing, such as this panel, identifies various immune reactions, helping clinicians pinpoint which foods may trigger symptoms.
This testing can be helpful when it’s important to differentiate food sensitivities from food allergies, as they require different management strategies. Unlike traditional allergy testing focusing on immediate responses, food sensitivity testing can reveal delayed, less obvious reactions.
Different companies offer different panels, which may assess various biomarkers. Increasingly, a combination of the following biomarkers are seen:
IgG, IgA, IgM, and IgE antibodies are the primary markers for food sensitivities. IgG is a commonly tested antibody in food sensitivity panels, reflecting a delayed, chronic immune response.
IgA and IgM are also assessed regarding mucosal immunity and initial immune responses, respectively.
IgE is typically tested in food allergy testing, but it can sometimes be part of food sensitivity panels if a clinician suspects allergic reactions in addition to sensitivities.
Complement Markers may also be tested in some panels, offering insights into inflammation and immune system activation.
Food sensitivity panels often test for common foods like dairy, gluten, soy, eggs, nuts, and shellfish. These foods are frequently implicated in immune reactions due to their protein structures, which can provoke an immune response in sensitive individuals.
However, many companies now offer testing for additional foods to help clinicians craft more personalized patient food plans. The specific foods tested will depend on the patient's history, symptoms, and dietary considerations.
Test results typically include a range of reactivity, from low to high. Low reactivity indicates minimal immune involvement and may not be clinically significant.
High reactivity suggests that the food is likely a trigger for symptoms. It’s essential to interpret these results in the context of the patient’s clinical presentation.
Positive results are not definitive diagnoses but guide further clinical action, such as elimination diets or further testing.
Food sensitivity testing is most useful when patients present with chronic, unexplained symptoms that don’t fit into conventional diagnostic categories. Conditions like irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), autoimmune disorders, and other inflammatory conditions may be associated with food sensitivities.
Testing may be especially useful when symptom patterns or patient history suggest a dietary trigger but when traditional allergy testing has been negative.
Food sensitivities are often tied to gut health and inflammation. Leaky gut syndrome, where the intestinal lining becomes permeable, is frequently linked with food sensitivities. Identifying specific triggers can help reduce systemic inflammation and improve gut function.
While food sensitivity testing can be highly informative, there are limitations.
False positives and negatives can occur, as these tests may detect clinically insignificant immune reactions. Additionally, sensitivity testing is not a one-size-fits-all solution—other factors, such as gut microbiota and leaky gut, should also be considered when interpreting results.
Finally, food sensitivity testing remains a controversial area, with some mainstream practitioners questioning its validity.
As with any assessment or treatment, the potential benefits should be weighed against the risks for every patient.
Click here to compare testing options and order testing for food allergies and sensitivities.
Allergy Blood Test. (2024). Medlineplus.gov. https://medlineplus.gov/lab-tests/allergy-blood-test
Cherry Salmon (Oncorhynchus masou). (n.d.). https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/documents/Ecological-Risk-Screening-Summary-Cherry-Salmon.pdf
Creasman, J. (n.d.). Masu. Wild Salmon Center. https://wildsalmoncenter.org/salmon-species/masu/
Fish. (2019, March 21). ACAAI Public Website. https://acaai.org/allergies/allergic-conditions/food/fish/
Fish, raw, wild, Atlantic, salmon nutrition facts and analysis. (n.d.). Www.nutritionvalue.org. https://www.nutritionvalue.org/Fish%2C_raw%2C_wild%2C_Atlantic%2C_salmon_nutritional_value.html
FIT 132 + Gut Barrier Panel by KBMO Diagnostics. (2020). Rupa Health. https://www.rupahealth.com/lab-tests/fit-132
Foran, J. A., Good, D. H., Carpenter, D. O., Hamilton, M. C., Knuth, B. A., & Schwager, S. J. (2005). Quantitative Analysis of the Benefits and Risks of Consuming Farmed and Wild Salmon. The Journal of Nutrition, 135(11), 2639–2643. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/135.11.2639
Greenan, S. (2021, November 17). The 8 Most Common Signs Of A Food Sensitivity. Rupa Health. https://www.rupahealth.com/post/a-functional-medicine-approach-to-food-sensitivities-testing-and-treatment
Harris, S. A., & Jones, J. L. (2008). Fish consumption and PCB-associated health risks in recreational fishermen on the James River, Virginia. Environmental Research, 107(2), 254–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2008.01.018
Laumonnier, Y., Korkmaz, R. Ü., Nowacka, A. A., & Köhl, J. (2023). Complement-mediated immune mechanisms in allergy. European journal of immunology, 53(10), e2249979. https://doi.org/10.1002/eji.202249979
Lopez CM, Yarrarapu SNS, Mendez MD. Food Allergies. [Updated 2023 Jul 24]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK482187/
McLendon K, Sternard BT. Anaphylaxis. [Updated 2023 Jan 26]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK482124/
Ogura, Y., & Hasegawa, K. (2023). Infection status of masu salmon Oncorhynchus masou by the parasite Salmonema cf. ephemeridarum (Nematoda, Cystidicolidae). Journal of Fish Biology, 104(4), 920–928. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.15631
Oka M, Arai T, Shibata Y, Miyazaki N. Concentrations of persistent organic pollutants in masu salmon, Oncorhynchus masou. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 2009 Sep;83(3):393-7. doi: 10.1007/s00128-009-9785-6. Epub 2009 May 22. PMID: 19462150.
Pantazopoulos, P., Sawyer, J. M., Turyk, M. E., Diamond, M., Bhavsar, S. P., Mergler, D., Schantz, S., Ratnayake, N., & Carpenter, D. O. (2013). Fatty acids in Great Lakes lake trout and whitefish. Journal of Great Lakes Research, 39(1), 120–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jglr.2012.12.012
Scheurer, S., Junker, A. C., He, C., Schülke, S., & Toda, M. (2023). The Role of IgA in the Manifestation and Prevention of Allergic Immune Responses. Current allergy and asthma reports, 23(10), 589–600. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11882-023-01105-x
Shakoor, Z., AlFaifi, A., AlAmro, B., AlTawil, L. N., & AlOhaly, R. Y. (2016). Prevalence of IgG-mediated food intolerance among patients with allergic symptoms. Annals of Saudi medicine, 36(6), 386–390. https://doi.org/10.5144/0256-4947.2016.386
Stanford, J. (2024, May 23). The Top 5 Food Sensitivities and Intolerances You Will See in Your Practice. Rupa Health. https://www.rupahealth.com/post/common-food-sensitivities-intolerances
Tuomisto JT, Asikainen A, Meriläinen P, Haapasaari P. Health effects of nutrients and environmental pollutants in Baltic herring and salmon: a quantitative benefit-risk assessment. BMC Public Health. 2020 Jan 15;20(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-8094-1. Erratum in: BMC Public Health. 2020 Mar 25;20(1):389. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08501-2. PMID: 31941472; PMCID: PMC6964011.
US EPA, O. (2015, July 30). EPA-FDA Advice about Eating Fish and Shellfish. Www.epa.gov. https://www.epa.gov/choose-fish-and-shellfish-wisely/epa-fda-advice-about-eating-fish-and-shellfish
Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. (n.d.). What Products Do I Use That Contain Mercury? https://dec.vermont.gov/sites/dec/files/wmp/SolidWaste/Documents/alittlebit.pdf
Vojdani A. (2009). Detection of IgE, IgG, IgA and IgM antibodies against raw and processed food antigens. Nutrition & metabolism, 6, 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-7075-6-22
What is mercury? (n.d.). https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/fish/fact-sheet/hgfactsnontechnical.pdf
Yuichi Iwasaki, Tomoko Oguri, Kazutoshi Ueda, Kentaro Morita, Significant metal accumulation in fish in a metal-contaminated river without detectable effects on fish and macroinvertebrate communities, Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 2025;, vgaf047, https://doi.org/10.1093/etojnl/vgaf047